Discourse Blog

Discourse Blog

Share this post

Discourse Blog
Discourse Blog
The Danger of the New York Times
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
User's avatar
Discover more from Discourse Blog
A daily politics, media criticism, and culture newsletter from the left. Worker-owned, subscriber-supported, and free from corporate influence. Est. 2020.
Over 22,000 subscribers
Already have an account? Sign in

The Danger of the New York Times

Gotta hear both sides on injecting yourself with Clorox.

Jack Mirkinson's avatar
Jack Mirkinson
Apr 24, 2020
23

Share this post

Discourse Blog
Discourse Blog
The Danger of the New York Times
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share

When they write the history of how America’s elite media handled the Donald Trump presidency, I suspect that this tweet from the New York Times will feature prominently:

The tweet and its accompanying story refer to the instantly infamous moment on Thursday when Trump began musing aloud about whether COVID-19 can be combated with ultraviolet light and an “injection” of disinfectant in the body. Here is some of what he said:

And then I see the disinfectant where it knocks it out in a minute — one minute — and is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside, or almost a cleaning? Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it would be interesting to check that.

You will surely have noticed that this is the kind of stuff that would get a normal person bundled off to an institution if they started screaming about it in a public setting. It does not take a Nobel Prize to understand that Trump is spewing dangerous nonsense. “Uhhhhhh the president is very wrong when he says to inject bleach in people” is not a tricky one in the annals of holding power to account. But the first instinct of the Times, the most important news outlet in America, was to cringe away from what should, by all rights, be a very easy task in both its tweet and its initial story:

Twitter avatar for @AdamSerwer
Adam Serwer🍝 @AdamSerwer
This paragraph belongs in a museum.
Image
10:49 AM ∙ Apr 24, 2020
3,593Likes809Retweets

“Dangerously, in the view of some experts.” Seven words that encompass an entire moldering journalistic ecosystem, a whole worldview that insists on retroactively transforming every monstrous, crackpot thing people in power say into just another point on the spectrum of American political thought.

It’s the “some” that really does it. “Some” implies that there are experts out there who back Trump up, that there is a live, reasoned debate to be had about whether a Lysol shot straight into your bloodstream is really the best way to ward off the coronavirus. Does the Times know something we don’t about the scientific dialogue around this topic? Did nobody realize that it’s quite irresponsible to suggest that only “some” people think a bleach injection is a bad idea—especially when Trump’s previous baseless medical assertions, such as his hyping of hydroxychloroquine, have had such serious consequences? (In an instance of grim timing, the FDA issued a warning against the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 on Friday morning). The Times has been doing lots of stellar work covering the coronavirus pandemic from multiple angles; we are right to expect more from them.

The paper eventually removed the offending phrase from later editions of the article. But its replacement was, if anything, even woolier and more confusing:

Twitter avatar for @lindseyadler
Lindsey Adler @lindseyadler
@AdamSerwer it's been updated to be... worse?
Image
12:48 PM ∙ Apr 24, 2020
32Likes4Retweets

“Could” be harmful! Yes, I think it could!

As of 9:45 EST on Friday morning, here is how the first paragraph of the Times story looks.

“Could” has been helpfully replaced by “would,” but even this somewhat more assertive version beggars belief, with the crucial words buried under layers of verbiage and subclauses. What is so difficult about saying, “President Trump pushed the dangerous and false idea on Thursday that an injection of disinfectant into the body could be used to combat the COVID-19 virus”? Instead, the paper of record ducks and covers.

In a moment of pure, white-hot crisis, when the president of the United States is putting more people in harm’s way than ever before, some experts might call that kind of behavior dangerous too.

Screenshot: White House


Subscribe to Discourse Blog

Thousands of paid subscribers
A daily politics, media criticism, and culture newsletter from the left. Worker-owned, subscriber-supported, and free from corporate influence. Est. 2020.
23

Share this post

Discourse Blog
Discourse Blog
The Danger of the New York Times
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share

Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dammit Karen's avatar
Dammit Karen
Apr 27, 2020

Fuck Dean Baquet with Maggie Habberman's dad.

Expand full comment
Like
Reply
Share
Bari Weiss Is Full of Shit
Her big trans panic story turned out to be nonsense, just like everything else she does.
Mar 2, 2023 • 
Katherine Krueger
304

Share this post

Discourse Blog
Discourse Blog
Bari Weiss Is Full of Shit
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
5
CNN's Disgraceful Propaganda
This segment from Dana Bash on the Palestine protest movement is one of the most shameful things I have ever seen on cable news.
May 2, 2024 • 
Jack Mirkinson
136

Share this post

Discourse Blog
Discourse Blog
CNN's Disgraceful Propaganda
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
55
No Hell Is Hot Enough for Joe Biden
I hope he’s faced with the horror he’s wrought when judgment comes to meet him.
Jan 17 • 
Katherine Krueger
84

Share this post

Discourse Blog
Discourse Blog
No Hell Is Hot Enough for Joe Biden
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
4

Ready for more?

© 2025 Discourse Blog Inc.
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Create your profile

User's avatar

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.