The ruling makes perfect sense when you consider the ultimate goal of the pro-birth movement: fetal personhood.
This case was just a convenient vehicle to get the belief that life begins at conception in front of a sympathetic court.
Most of these folks don't oppose IVF in principle. They just don't want the "wrong" people (i.e. same sex couples) to have access to it.
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
The ruling makes perfect sense when you consider the ultimate goal of the pro-birth movement: fetal personhood.
This case was just a convenient vehicle to get the belief that life begins at conception in front of a sympathetic court.
Most of these folks don't oppose IVF in principle. They just don't want the "wrong" people (i.e. same sex couples) to have access to it.