The Right Wants You to Stop Talking About the Buffalo Shooter's Ideology

It's apparently unfair to point out the clear, direct connections between the massacre and the Great Replacement conspiracy parroted by conservatives.

Screenshot: Fox News

This piece by journalist Eoin Higgins was originally co-published by The Flashpoint. The Flashpoint, like Discourse Blog, is part of the Discontents media collective. 

Subscribe to The Flashpoint now and get 20% off.

---

by Eoin Higgins for The Flashpoint

On Saturday, an 18-year-old man named Payton Gendron killed 10 people in a TOPS supermarket in Buffalo.

Of the 13 people Gendron shot, 11 were Black—in his livestream of the shooting, he’s heard saying “sorry” to a white man he shoots. The other victims seem to have been hardly even spared a thought.

Gendron’s motivations for the shooting were made clear in a 180-page manifesto he published online. The far-right document, which included multiple antisemitic references and made clear he was expressly targeting the store and area because of the area’s large Black population, left little to the imagination.

The manifesto included a nearly word-for-word repeat of Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s interpretation of the racist Great Replacement narrative, a far-right conspiracy theory that claims Democrats and/or Jews are trying to dilute the white American electorate by importing immigrants of color.

℮oin Higgins @EoinHiggins_

Tucker, Tucker, Buffalo shooter

This should come as no surprise to anyone who’s paid even the slightest attention to Carlson over the past few years. The TV dinner heir and child of total privilege who claims to speak for the common man has long had an affinity for the most racist of conspiracy theories.

Yet rather than reflect on the similarity between the ideological conspiracy theory they’re pushing and the motivations of the Buffalo shooter, conservatives are crying foul at the suggestion they might have some culpability for spreading hate.

---

Carlson is hardly alone. His allies and followers in the Republican Party have been parroting the “replacement” line for years. GOP rising star Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), one of the biggest proponents of the conspiracy, used it in a September 2021 campaign ad. Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fl.) used the term directly in a tweet praising Carlson, and candidates such as Ohio’s JD Vance have also embraced the language. You can read a good overview from Judd Legum here.

But instead of rethinking how they talk about immigrants and people of color, conservatives have gone on the offensive, playing aggrieved to drown their critics in crocodile tears. Stefanik, in a statement, expressed her sympathies for the victims of the shooting—and then turned things over to senior advisor Alex DeGrasse for a doubling down on anti-immigrant sentiments.

Meanwhile, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wy.) tried to distance herself and her party from the racism she’s been a supporter of for years, claiming that “House GOP leadership has enabled white nationalism, white supremacy, and antisemitism” while conveniently ignoring her own support for the racist birther movement, her career of Islamophobic hate speech, and her hardline anti-immigration rhetoric—all of which is functionally no different from the more explicit conspiracy theories being repeated by Stefanik et al.

---

Social media influencer and Tucker Carlson sycophant Glenn Greenwald, writing on his Substack blog, argued that those seeking to look into the ideological ties between the Fox News host and the shooter were being unfair. “There is no racial hierarchy in Carlson's view of American citizenship and to claim that there is is nothing short of a defamatory lie,” Greenwald wrote, conveniently ignoring—as usual—the fact that Carlson’s entire worldview is based on racial hierarchy and bigotry.

Other media figures also leapt at the opportunity to play defense, whining about fairness and respect for the dead. Commentator Kmele Foster complained that, “When a lunatic goes on a deadly rampage, maybe wait 24-48 hrs before co-opting the tragedy to malice your political enemies.” Daily Wire writer Megan Basham pretended to take the high road, calling on critics “not to pit racial groups against one another,” a principle that, if applied, would erase the majority of her boss Ben Shapiro’s output. And Breitbart’s Joel Pollack whimpered that looking into the shooter’s ideological ties to other conservatives was a “predictable attempt to exploit the shooting to censor debate and opposition”—even as he reiterated his support for the Great Replacement conspiracy.

Wailing about persecution and unfairness is the right’s go-to move whenever they’re forced to actually answer for the reality of their belief system, and the fallout from Saturday’s shooting is no different. The more noise they make to distract you, the more worried they are that people are paying attention to what they actually say.

---

If you would like to support Eoin’s work, please consider a paid subscription.

Find Eoin on Twitter and Facebook.

Email him at eoinhiggins@gmail.com.