I think the point made here is that the university choose to give the microphone to someone who has clearly spoken up against what policies the university claims to hold dear.
I think the point made here is that the university choose to give the microphone to someone who has clearly spoken up against what policies the university claims to hold dear.
You can and if you disagree with it, should. My take on the scenario written about - and any like it - is that when a person who has personal beliefs that are different than the ones the university/company/group claim to uphold, and especially when they have said so in public form, they should not be invited to speak for that university/company/group.
I think the point made here is that the university choose to give the microphone to someone who has clearly spoken up against what policies the university claims to hold dear.
Oh. I thought the point was you can walk away from speech you rather not hear.
You can and if you disagree with it, should. My take on the scenario written about - and any like it - is that when a person who has personal beliefs that are different than the ones the university/company/group claim to uphold, and especially when they have said so in public form, they should not be invited to speak for that university/company/group.