A few articles were actually not bad, but leading with something so shallow as the obvious use of studio makeup was a huge turnoff. This is what I moved on from corporate cable to avoid.
A few articles were actually not bad, but leading with something so shallow as the obvious use of studio makeup was a huge turnoff. This is what I moved on from corporate cable to avoid.
I just prefer publications that are less cavalier and don't run pieces that lead with physical commentary. Had a skin condition in high school and had enough of that there.
Didn't subscribe. Just disengaging after reading.
A few articles were actually not bad, but leading with something so shallow as the obvious use of studio makeup was a huge turnoff. This is what I moved on from corporate cable to avoid.
“a few articles were actually not bad” — one of our best-ever reviews! thanks for sampling moe, sorry we weren’t to your taste.
No worries.
I just prefer publications that are less cavalier and don't run pieces that lead with physical commentary. Had a skin condition in high school and had enough of that there.
You're leaving? You're making the gay birds cry. Do you even believe in irony?