> No, the Israeli electorate elected him, but the palestinians, their rulers at least, in large measure helped create the situation wherein he became viable.
So what you’re saying is that Israel is not a democracy, and Israelis who nonetheless vote in elections (and serve in the IDF) are wee wittow babies with no agency in their lives, be…
> No, the Israeli electorate elected him, but the palestinians, their rulers at least, in large measure helped create the situation wherein he became viable.
So what you’re saying is that Israel is not a democracy, and Israelis who nonetheless vote in elections (and serve in the IDF) are wee wittow babies with no agency in their lives, because the Israeli government is at the behest of an international Palestinian cabal that secretly controls Israeli politics from behind the scenes?
> The UN has supported Hamas either through incompetence or complicity for decades. Likely both. So have many US-based NGOs.
So what you’re saying is that supposition is better than proof?
So what you’re saying is that we must secure the existence of the Jewish people and a future for Jewish children, because the beauty of the Israeli Jewish woman must not perish from the Earth?
The fact that I am being a raging c*nt does not make you correct. I am being a raging c*nt because you are being an uwu smol bean about genocide. You do not get to be an uwu smol bean.
As far as I can tell our “fundamental disagreement” is that you have been intellectually dishonest from the start, and I am treating your behavior as the contemptuousness it always was.
Which is to say that our “fundamental disagreement” is that you are lying about your intentions and beliefs, and I am mocking you for doing so.
Honestly I think we can agree on this much, right?
[EDIT] I can tell that you are American, because only Americans know shame when it comes to Israel, whereas Israelis by and large don’t care what people think.
Again, that is exactly what I have been implying you are doing all this time.
If you genuinely believe you are not being willfully obtuse, you are entirely free to substantiate and defend the positions you hold. No one is stopping you from doing so.
What’s a bad look, though, is deflecting disagreement rather than engaging with it. This sort of behavior tends to lead one to conclude that you do not in fact believe in anything at all.
> No, the Israeli electorate elected him, but the palestinians, their rulers at least, in large measure helped create the situation wherein he became viable.
So what you’re saying is that Israel is not a democracy, and Israelis who nonetheless vote in elections (and serve in the IDF) are wee wittow babies with no agency in their lives, because the Israeli government is at the behest of an international Palestinian cabal that secretly controls Israeli politics from behind the scenes?
> The UN has supported Hamas either through incompetence or complicity for decades. Likely both. So have many US-based NGOs.
So what you’re saying is that supposition is better than proof?
I think you know exactly what I'm saying, in both instances. Have a great day.
So what you’re saying is that we must secure the existence of the Jewish people and a future for Jewish children, because the beauty of the Israeli Jewish woman must not perish from the Earth?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBJYxPN8qIA
To answer your question: why, yes, I am, in fact, expressing contempt for your intellectual honesty!
Not sure how to get to that. At least I don’t go out of my way to be obtuse.
You are correct in assessing that this entire time I have in fact been accusing you of being willfully obtuse.
Project much?
The fact that I am being a raging c*nt does not make you correct. I am being a raging c*nt because you are being an uwu smol bean about genocide. You do not get to be an uwu smol bean.
And you're not being a "raging c*nt". Unless you need to be. You and I just disagree on a fundamental level.
I’m glad to see we are in agreement that you are the depraved, empty husk of a man, who genuinely does not believe in anything at all…
As far as I can tell our “fundamental disagreement” is that you have been intellectually dishonest from the start, and I am treating your behavior as the contemptuousness it always was.
Which is to say that our “fundamental disagreement” is that you are lying about your intentions and beliefs, and I am mocking you for doing so.
Honestly I think we can agree on this much, right?
[EDIT] I can tell that you are American, because only Americans know shame when it comes to Israel, whereas Israelis by and large don’t care what people think.
What do we disagree about?
Again, that is exactly what I have been implying you are doing all this time.
If you genuinely believe you are not being willfully obtuse, you are entirely free to substantiate and defend the positions you hold. No one is stopping you from doing so.
What’s a bad look, though, is deflecting disagreement rather than engaging with it. This sort of behavior tends to lead one to conclude that you do not in fact believe in anything at all.
I will let those who believe Netanyahu is the root of the conflict make their case. I merely ask they not ignore either history or reality.
For extra credit:
1) define the difference between genocide and urban warfare, and how this applies to the current conflict.
2) Who is responsible and why.
Take all the time you need. #2 pencil not required.
Genocide is when you have other people spoon-feed you legal documents because you’re a wee baby who can’t read them yourself, ooh-wee!
https://youtu.be/MA_Z4uOGOzA
“That’s the point of this video, to look at an influencer’s tweets and call him dumb, not to use drama farming as excuse to read the ICJ application…”
https://peterbeinart.substack.com/p/why-biden-and-schumers-anti-netanyahu